Khamenei orders an 'immediate, geographically unrestricted' response to any attack on Iran
Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei said on Saturday that any threat against Iran must be met with 'an immediate, impactful, and geographically unrestricted response', and ordered the armed forces to update their lists of US and Israeli targets. The order came as Iranian envoys met Qatari mediators in Doha, Washington weighed restarting strikes after the US midterms, and Tehran paired the warning with an offer to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within two days if its conditions are met. On Sunday Iran also designated Britain's Royal Navy and RAF as terrorist organisations.
Checking in progress
This story is still being checked. Claims below are published as claims — never dressed as facts — and each one moves only when the evidence earns it.
- Collecting reportsDone
- Grouping the versionsDone
- 3Checking claims26 of 31 claims checked
- 4Human gateStill to come
26 of 31 claims checked so far · step 3 of 4: Checking claims
Key points
- Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei ordered an 'immediate, impactful, and geographically unrestricted' response to any attack on Iran, and the military says its US and Israel target lists have been updated.
- Iranian envoys are talking through Qatari mediators in Doha; on Monday evening President Trump, asked whether he was considering striking Iran after Tuesday's US midterms, replied 'no', and told Axios there is 'no rush' to decide — while no formal decision has been announced. US officials told the Wall Street Journal the US attacked Qeshm Island on Monday as part of smaller-scale strikes carried out for weeks without announcement — and on Tuesday Trump himself confirmed the Monday strike on Fox & Friends, saying the US hit a newly completed anti-aircraft facility in a 'minor attack'.
- Tehran pairs the threat with an offer: the Strait of Hormuz fully reopened in two days if its conditions are met — sanctions lifted, frozen funds released, US forces reduced.
- On Sunday Iran designated Britain's Royal Navy and RAF as terrorist organisations and MI6 a hostile group, answering London's July designation of the IRGC.
Watch: the moment itself
Direct video sits at the top of Vozia's evidence ladder — the moment itself, from its owner. Embedded from its home platform; we never download or re-host it.
Video: Al Jazeera English · Watch on YouTube
What happened
The war that began with US and Israeli strikes on Iran in February has been in an uneasy pause: President Trump has held off further strikes in the weeks before the US midterm elections, while Qatar shuttles between Tehran and Washington with proposals to reopen the Strait of Hormuz — the waterway whose closure has kept Gulf shipping and oil markets on edge. Iran has been proposing a phased reopening since September, on conditions Washington has so far rejected.
Saturday brought both tracks into the open at once. Khamenei's written statement raised Iran's declared response to any new attack from retaliation to retaliation without geographic limits, and the military announced updated target lists. Within hours, his foreign minister was telling Al Jazeera that a two-day reopening of the strait was on the table — and his security chief was calling the tone of a letter from Vice President Vance a 'very good sign'. On Sunday, Tehran extended the confrontation to London, designating the Royal Navy and the RAF in answer to Britain's designation of the Revolutionary Guards.
Claim by claim
Why this label: The statement was posted on Khamenei's official Telegram account and reported by Reuters on 31 October; the same wording is carried by Reuters' syndicated copies. Khamenei has not appeared in public since succeeding his father, who was killed at the war's outset — the statement is a written one, and no side disputes that he issued it.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: The readiness account is in Khamenei's own statement as reported by Reuters. The order to update the target list — described by the IRGC-affiliated Tasnim agency as covering US and Israeli 'physical and non-physical' assets — is reported by Reuters and by US coverage of the Tasnim account; the chief of staff, Ali Abdollahi, said a new list had been prepared. What is verified is that the order was given and announced; the contents of any target list are not public.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: Reuters reports the meetings from a source briefed on the negotiations; Al Jazeera's own interview with Foreign Minister Araghchi confirms an Iranian delegation travelled to Doha and that Qatari mediators had been in Tehran the day before. The fact of the meetings is confirmed by both; what was agreed inside them is not public.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Show all claims (28 more)
Why this label: Rubio's remarks are reported by Reuters. Regional governments expect Trump, who held off strikes in the weeks before Tuesday's US midterm elections, could restart attacks once voting is over — that expectation is the context for Khamenei's statement, not a US announcement.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: Araghchi said this directly to Al Jazeera on Saturday, in an interview read in full. His conditions for reopening the strait include lifting the sanctions imposed after the Islamabad memorandum, reducing US forces in the region, restoring oil waivers, releasing frozen Iranian funds and recognising the shipping routes Iran discussed with Oman. This is Iran's stated negotiating position — no US acceptance of it has been announced, and Qatar first proposed a five-day implementation before the two-day figure was reached, per Araghchi.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: Both points are Rezaei's own statements as reported by Reuters: he described the Vance letter (sent via Qatar) as a positive sign, and said the nuclear-doctrine question is being debated inside Iran without any decision. A hardline lawmaker, Mahmoud Nabavian, separately demanded a change of doctrine — a demand, not a policy. The White House has not published the letter's contents; descriptions of it rest on press reports.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: The ministry's statement, quoted in full by Iran's Press TV, says the move follows a Supreme National Security Council resolution and reciprocates Britain's July designation of the IRGC. The announcement itself is confirmed by multiple independent reports (AnewZ, Azernews) as well as the ministry's own text. The ministry did not say what the designations mean in practice, and no UK government response had been published when those reports were written. The designations are Iran's legal characterisation, not an international ruling.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: This reporting (Al-Araby Al-Jadeed, carried by the Times of Israel and Axios and repeated by secondary outlets) is contradicted by Iran's own foreign minister: Araghchi told Al Jazeera there are no plans for meetings with US officials and dismissed talk of upcoming meetings as media speculation, and an Iranian source told Al-Araby the talks remain indirect. Neither Washington nor Tehran has confirmed a breakthrough or any deal term.
On the ladder: credible sources conflict, so we show both workings. One side's own statement is that side's position — never proof.
Why this label: Verified as UKMTO's own report: the agency's wording is carried the same way by Reuters' syndicated report, AFP's report and Anadolu — the occurrence of a UKMTO report of a Sunday strike is established. UKMTO did not name the vessel, the projectile or who fired it, and this page does not treat the Sunday report as the same incident as Friday's Al Mayeda attack, which is carried on its own page.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: The identification is security consultancy Vanguard Tech's, reported by The Maritime Executive (the vessel's name, its departure from Al Hamriyah and the partially-sinking report all rest on that consultancy and AIS data, not on UKMTO or the vessel's owner, neither of which had named the ship in the reporting read). ISW assesses Iran likely struck the vessel — that is an analytical assessment, not a finding, and no attacker has been officially identified.
On the ladder: the evidence so far sits low — early, single or social sources. We publish the claim as a claim, never as fact.
Why this label: Trump's own words, carried as statements: the rally remarks and the Pickaxe Mountain line are AFP's report (via Arab News, read in full); the deal-or-end-it line is CNBC's report of his Sunday RSBN interview (read in full). Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters over the weekend that Trump would like to resolve the war 'peacefully and as soon as possible' and 'hasn't made a decision' on striking (CNBC) — consistent with his Saturday position already carried in the claims above, so it is recorded here and in the update history rather than stacked as a second Rubio claim. None of this is a decision to strike; no order has been announced.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: A report about a private conversation, resting on one Israeli and one US source cited by Axios and carried by the Jerusalem Post (read in full); AFP's account of the same call agrees that Axios reported Netanyahu pressing for an immediate post-midterm strike. What Trump himself confirmed on Sunday is only that the call happened and that Iran was discussed — 'We had a very good conversation' — declining to share details; on Saturday he said negotiations with Iran were 'going fine'. The urging itself is not confirmed by either leader's office in anything read for this page.
On the ladder: the evidence so far sits low — early, single or social sources. We publish the claim as a claim, never as fact.
Why this label: Reuters' Monday report (read via its Devdiscourse syndication in this run) quotes the official briefed on the talks on both the reason for the departure and the circulating draft; TASS reported the delegation's departure from Doha to review settlement proposals in the same window. This is a process fact about the talks, not a claim about any agreement — no text of the draft has been published and Washington has not responded publicly.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: Verified as Iran's stated position: Baghaei's Monday remarks are reported by Anadolu Agency and in Reuters' Monday report (carried by Arab News) that Iran says the Strait of Hormuz could reopen within two days if the US meets its demands. The two-day timetable remains Iran's conditional proposal — the same one Foreign Minister Araghchi described to Al Jazeera, already carried on this page — not an agreed reopening.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: Verified as Iran's stated position: Araghchi's comments were carried by the state outlet IRNA and reported by Reuters (read in full in this run); Arab News carried the same "very intensive" indirect-talks line. No agreement is claimed by either side.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: Verified as the president's statement, reported by Reuters from Iranian state media. Reuters does not elaborate what the "certain authorities" cover, and Pezeshkian did not either — the scope goes to the don't-know list rather than being guessed at.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: Reuters' market report, read in full in this run; the contracts traded as low as $105.86 (Brent) and $97.12 (WTI) after Pezeshkian's comments. Prices are a market reaction, not evidence that a deal exists.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: Reported by Reuters (read in full): Wang Yi spoke after meeting senior Iranian security official Ali Bagheri Kani in Beijing; the Russian statement is the ministry's own. These are the two governments' stated positions.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: Reuters reports the belief of unnamed Iranian sources; it is an assessment, not an announced decision by Washington or Tehran, so it stays Not yet verified.
On the ladder: the evidence so far sits low — early, single or social sources. We publish the claim as a claim, never as fact.
Why this label: Trump's own words on Monday evening, reported in full by Reuters (read in full in this pass) and carried with the same 'no' answer and the same Axios 'no rush' interview by Anadolu (read in full in this pass). This claim REPLACES his previous latest position in place (replace, don't stack): on Sunday he was still repeating that the US could strike after the 3 November midterms and telling RSBN Tehran would 'make a deal or we'll just end it' — that Sunday wording stays in the update history. Carried as his stated position: no formal decision has been announced, and no US acceptance of Tehran's proposal is reported by any source read.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: Tehran's conditions as listed by Al Jazeera (read in full in this pass), consistent with the plan elements in this page's earlier claims; Reuters' account of the same Monday statements (read via syndication in this pass) gives the same condensed two-day plan and the same blockade/Hormuz/nuclear sequencing. Whether Washington accepts any of it remains in the don't-know list.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: The Guards' claim as carried by the semi-official Tasnim news agency and reported by Anadolu Agency (read in full via live-browser recovery in this run) and by The Insight International's Tehran report (read in full in this run), which carries the same two MQM-170s south of Qeshm and the total of four. This is one side's military claim with no independent confirmation and no US comment on this incident — the drone losses themselves are not verified. Anadolu notes two similar Iranian announcements last week, and that Washington rejected Thursday's account.
On the ladder: the evidence so far sits low — early, single or social sources. We publish the claim as a claim, never as fact.
Why this label: UPGRADED to Verified in the 14:47Z append: the strike no longer rests only on unnamed officials. President Trump — the principal, and the commander-in-chief — confirmed it in his own on-record words on Fox & Friends on Tuesday morning, quoted by The Times (read in full in this run) with Le Monde reporting the same confirmation; under the principal's-own-words rule his statement verifies that the US carried out the strike and his description of its target (a newly completed anti-aircraft facility). The surrounding detail still rests on unnamed officials and is carried as such in the claim text: the 'defensive' rationale, the surface-to-air-missile launcher detail and the weeks-long series of unannounced strikes come from officials speaking to the Wall Street Journal, AP, CNN and Reuters, not from any public US statement. Iranian news agencies independently reported explosions on Qeshm Island and in Bandar Lengeh, which corroborates explosions, not by itself who carried them out. No casualty or damage figures are given in any of the reports read, and no CENTCOM public statement had been read when this update published. Trump's confirmation also directly qualifies his own words to reporters on Monday evening — that there had been no fighting for months.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: The official's words are reported directly by Reuters (read in full via Arab News in this run) — the claim verified here is that Tehran's position was stated in these terms on Tuesday, not that the gaps are as the official describes them. The position is consistent with the conditions Iran has stated on this page since Saturday; what is new is the timing (election day in the US), the Qatari mediators' Monday-night move to Tehran, and the eight-day age put on the draft under negotiation.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: A public statement by a named office-holder, reported by Reuters (read in full via Arab News in this run). It is carried as Iran's stated position, not as a finding about what any response would be.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: Araghchi's statement and the Riyadh framing are reported by Reuters (read in full via Arab News in this run). The regional track is new to this page; no text of any arrangement has been published.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: The Guards' claim as reported by Reuters (read in full via Arab News in this run). It is a new claim, distinct from the Guards' Monday claim — already on this page, also Not yet verified — to have brought down two MQM-170 drones south of Qeshm by electronic warfare. No US response to the MQ-9 claim had been reported in the material read, and no wreckage or independent confirmation has been published.
On the ladder: the evidence so far sits low — early, single or social sources. We publish the claim as a claim, never as fact.
Why this label: Abdollahi's message as reported by Anadolu Agency (read in full via live-browser recovery in this run; Anadolu attributes the statements to Iranian state broadcaster IRIB) and by Press TV, the state broadcaster's own English service. Carried as Iran's stated military position, never as a finding about capability or intent in fact. Reuters' Tuesday report independently carries the same target-list and 'without geographical limits' lines from Abdollahi. The wording echoes the Supreme Leader's Saturday order already on this page (claim 1); this is the armed forces chief restating it as doctrine on Tuesday, not a new order.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: The five principles as listed by Anadolu Agency (read in full via live-browser recovery in this run) and in the same order by Press TV. They are the armed forces chief's stated principles in a published message. They overlap with — but are not identical to — the negotiating conditions of the seven-step plan already on this page: recognition of Iranian sovereignty over Hormuz and war compensation appear here in terms the negotiators' published conditions do not use, and whether these five are now Tehran's formal negotiating terms is not stated in the reports read; that gap is carried in the don't-know list.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: AFP's report from Tehran (read in full via Arab News via live-browser recovery in this run; the same AFP report is carried by The Hindu, Vanguard and Punch — copies of one agency report count as one source). The display is a photographed public installation reported by the agency's own staff in the capital; the claim is carried as Verified on that basis, with the single-chain sourcing stated openly here. AFP names no sponsor or commissioning body for the billboard, and its report carries no US official reaction — both gaps are in the don't-know list. The photograph illustrating AFP's report is of an earlier, July billboard on Jomhouri Street, not of the new Enghelab Square board; this page's own hero image is unchanged and remains a labelled file photo.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: Verified as Trump's own stated position, in his own words (The Times, read in full in this run) — NOT verified as a description of the strait itself. Control is contested on this page's own evidence: the Revolutionary Guards claim three tankers hit mines and caught fire transiting without permission (an unconfirmed Iranian-side claim, queue #1224), and the IMO's chief has said the strait remains unsafe with mine clearance unconfirmed (queue #1229; the IMO's own statement has not yet been read directly). The quote is published because a president's claim of control over the world's most contested waterway is itself news — the claim, not the control, is what is verified.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
What we know / what we don't know yet
What we know
- Khamenei issued the readiness order in a written statement on Saturday 31 October, and the armed forces announced updated target lists.
- Talks are running through Qatari mediators — Tehran on Friday, Doha on Saturday — with no direct US–Iran meeting announced by either side.
- The US has announced no decision on restarting strikes; Rubio says diplomacy is preferred.
Show more (3)
- Iran's designations of the Royal Navy, the RAF and MI6 took effect under Iranian law on Sunday 1 November.
- Trump has now said the quiet part in public: he told an Iowa rally on Sunday that 'at some point we're going to have to give them the hammer', while Rubio says no strike decision has been taken and Trump would prefer a peaceful resolution (AFP; CNBC).
- That explosions were reported on Qeshm Island and in Bandar Lengeh on Monday by Iranian news agencies, and that President Trump confirmed on Tuesday, in his own on-record words on Fox & Friends, that the United States carried out Monday night's strike — hitting, he said, a newly completed anti-aircraft facility. The strike account no longer rests only on unnamed US officials speaking to the Journal, AP and CNN.
What we don't know yet
- Whether Trump's Monday-evening 'no' holds as the final word on restarting strikes after the midterm elections — he has announced no formal decision, US officials have since told the Wall Street Journal the US struck Qeshm Island on Monday as part of unannounced smaller-scale strikes over several weeks, and in the same evening's Axios interview he kept the option open in words: 'One way or the other, we will do something, but there is no rush.'
- Whether any part of Iran's Hormuz proposal has been accepted in principle by Washington; the Vance letter's contents are not public.
- What Iran's designations of British forces change in practice for ships, aircraft or personnel.
Show more (11)
- Whether the nuclear-doctrine debate inside Iran goes anywhere — Rezaei says no decision has been taken.
- The identity and condition of the vessel UKMTO reported struck on Sunday, and its crew's status — the Selat Storm identification rests on a security consultancy's report, not on UKMTO or an owner statement read for this page.
- Whether Netanyahu in fact urged an immediate post-midterm strike — that rests on Axios's two unnamed sources; Trump confirms only that the Saturday call happened and that Iran was discussed.
- What the draft proposal now circulating between the Doha participants contains, and whether or when a follow-up meeting happens — the draft's text is not public and no date had been announced.
- What the "certain authorities" Khamenei granted the government for peace talks actually cover — neither Pezeshkian nor Reuters' reporting elaborates, and no text has been published.
- Whether any US drone was in fact brought down south of Qeshm on Monday — the Revolutionary Guards say two MQM-170s were downed by electronic warfare and captured, but no US response to this claim had been reported and Washington rejected a similar Iranian account last week.
- What exactly was hit beyond Trump's description of a newly completed anti-aircraft facility, and whether there were casualties or damage — no figures have been reported in the material read, and no CENTCOM public statement had been read when this update published.
- Whether a US MQ-9 drone was in fact downed overnight east of the Strait of Hormuz — the Revolutionary Guards' claim is reported by Reuters, but no US response or independent confirmation had been read for this page.
- Who commissioned or authorised the Enghelab Square 'We will kill Trump' billboard — AFP's report names no sponsor, and no US official reaction to the display had been reported in the material read for this page.
- Whether Armed Forces Chief Abdollahi's five principles (Tuesday) are now Tehran's formal negotiating terms, or a military doctrine statement alongside the talks — the reports read present them as his message's principles and do not say the negotiators have adopted them.
- Iran's response to Trump's public confirmation of the strike — none had been read in full when this update published; Le Monde's report of the confirmation carried a reaction from deputy foreign minister Kazem Gharibabadi reserving Tehran's right to defend itself, which still needs to be read directly.
Why it matters
The Gulf war's next move now sits on a calendar date — Tuesday's US midterms. Tehran has used the pause to do two things at once: raise the stated price of a new attack (a response 'without geographic limits', aimed at US and Israeli assets wherever they can be reached) and lower the stated price of a deal (a two-day reopening of the strait that carries a fifth of the world's oil). Which of those Washington answers first decides whether the coming week brings a settlement track or a wider war — and Iran's move against Britain's forces shows the confrontation is already spreading beyond the two original belligerents.
Background
Show the background timeline (6)
The US and Israel launch strikes on Iran. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is killed in the war's opening phase; his son Mojtaba succeeds him.
Britain announces, then brings into force, the designation of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps under the National Security (State Threats) Act 2026.
Iran proposes a seven-day plan to reopen the Strait of Hormuz in return for lifting the blockade of its ports, unfreezing assets and easing oil sanctions. President Trump rejects it on 26 September.
Qatari mediators spend more than 12 hours in talks in Tehran on Friday; an Iranian delegation travels to Doha on Saturday. A letter from US Vice President JD Vance, passed via Qatar, is studied in Tehran.
Khamenei issues his readiness order. Araghchi tells Al Jazeera a two-day Hormuz reopening is possible if Iran's conditions are met, and that no meeting with US officials is planned.
Iran's Foreign Ministry designates the Royal Navy and the RAF as terrorist organisations and MI6 as a hostile group, effective immediately under Iranian law.
Update history
No silent edits. Every change is written here, with its time.
- Latest
Checking in progress — Trump himself confirms the Qeshm strike (crawler #1260, Le Monde; The Times live, read in full in this run): on Fox & Friends on Tuesday morning the president said Iran built an anti-aircraft facility and “as soon as it was completed, we hit it last night very nicely”, calling it a “minor attack”, and insisted the US has “total control of the Hormuz Strait”. Under the principal's-own-words rule, claim 22 is edited IN PLACE (replace, don't stack) and upgraded from Not yet verified to Verified — for the fact of the strike and Trump's target description; the defensive rationale and surface-to-air detail still rest on unnamed officials and stay labelled as such in the claim. The 'total control' line is added as a new claim Verified as his stated position only, with the contested evidence (the Guards' tanker claim; the IMO chief's 'still unsafe' position) named in its note. Audit catches in this append: the key point that still called the Qeshm report 'Not yet verified' was re-written in the same edit, and the don't-know entry that asked whether the US in fact struck Qeshm was replaced with what remains unknown (exact target detail, casualties/damage, a CENTCOM statement) rather than left standing. Iran's response to the confirmation is awaited and is carried in the don't-know list. Video check: the story already carries the oEmbed-verified Al Jazeera Qeshm report; no official-channel video of the Fox & Friends Iran segment was verified in this run. This story carries no French/Arabic full text (headline/summary only), and neither was changed, so no full text was at risk.
Checking in progress — Tehran hardens its public line on election day (crawler #1179 and #1178): Armed Forces Chief of Staff Major General Ali Abdollahi, in a Tuesday message, restated the 'response without geographical limits' as doctrine — target lists updated to cover US and Israeli material and non-material assets — and set out five principles for regional security, including recognition of Iranian sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz and war compensation (Anadolu Agency, read in full via live-browser recovery; Press TV in agreement; Reuters carries the same target-list lines). And AFP reports a massive 'We will kill Trump' billboard unveiled over Tehran's Enghelab Square, with a mocking open-air exhibition at Tajrish Square. Three claims added, all Verified as stated positions or as a photographed public display, with the single-chain AFP sourcing stated on the billboard claim itself; the sponsor of the billboard and any US reaction are carried in the don't-know list, and Abdollahi's five principles are kept distinct from the negotiators' seven-step conditions already on this page. Audit before deploy: headline, slug and summary untouched and still state the same outcome; no number in the new material beyond the five listed principles and the 28 February war-start date already on this page; sides are stated as positions only. Video check: the story already carries Al Jazeera English's oEmbed-verified Qeshm report; no official-channel video of Tuesday's message or of the billboard was identified in the sources read. This story carries no French or Arabic full text (headline and summary only, both unchanged), so no full-text rebuild arose. The story stays in Checking.
Checking in progress — Tehran's Tuesday position lands on election day (crawler #1160; #1161, #1162 and #1168 are the same overnight-Qeshm cluster): a senior Iranian official told Reuters (read in full via Arab News in this run) that a deal is still far off, that Tehran will not accept 'excessive' US demands and that its conditions must be met before Hormuz reopens, with nuclear talks only afterwards; Qatari mediators travelled to Tehran on Monday night over a draft negotiated for eight days; Speaker Qalibaf said the ball is in Washington's court; and Foreign Minister Araghchi said Iran–Saudi talks are ongoing. Four claims are added with those labels — the three statements Verified as statements of position, never as findings — and one is not: the Guards say they downed a US MQ-9 overnight east of Hormuz, a new claim distinct from Monday's MQM-170 claim, labelled Not yet verified with the awaited US response in the don't-know list. The Qeshm strike claim is edited in place, not stacked, to add Reuters' unnamed-official detail that the strikes targeted surface-to-air missiles used against US assets; it stays Not yet verified, because every chain still rests on unnamed officials and CENTCOM has still made no public statement. Audit before deploy: headline, slug and summary untouched and still state the same outcome; no Disputed or Not-yet-verified fact is stated as settled in the new material; the only number added (eight days of draft negotiation) traces to the Reuters report named on the claims. Video: the story already carries Al Jazeera English's oEmbed-verified Qeshm report from the 02:38 update; no new official video of Tuesday's statements was identified in the sources read. This story carries no French or Arabic full text (headline and summary only), so no full-text rebuild arose. The story stays in Checking.
Show earlier updates (13)
Checking in progress — the Qeshm strike account widens beyond one chain (crawler #1116–#1118, one event): the Associated Press has cited a US official saying the US conducted defensive strikes against Iranian targets in the Strait of Hormuz (Al Jazeera, read in full via live-browser recovery in this run), and CNN has cited a US official describing Monday's limited Qeshm strikes as a defensive measure against Iranians using surface-to-air missiles against US assets (CNN, read via search in this run; Reuters carries the same core reporting). The Qeshm claim on this page has been edited in place, not stacked: the corroboration is real, but every chain still rests on unnamed officials, CENTCOM has made no public statement, and no casualty figures are reported — so the claim stays labelled Not yet verified and the awaited US statement stays in the don't-know list. Video: Al Jazeera English's report of the Qeshm explosions, verified via YouTube's oEmbed endpoint (HTTP 200) in this run, is now embedded. This story carries no French or Arabic full text, so no full-text rebuild arose. The story stays in Checking.
Checking in progress — US officials say the US struck Qeshm Island on Monday (queue #1108/#1109): The Wall Street Journal reports, citing unnamed US officials, that the United States attacked Iran's Qeshm Island on Monday — the latest in a series of smaller-scale strikes carried out in recent weeks without public announcement, some described by officials as defensive, to keep Iran from threatening commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz (the Journal's report read via search in this run; Anadolu, read in full via live-browser recovery, and the Jerusalem Post carry the same reporting). Iranian news agencies independently reported explosions on Qeshm and in Bandar Lengeh. Added as a Not yet verified claim: it is one reporting chain, CENTCOM did not immediately respond to the Journal, no casualty figures are reported, and no Iranian official confirmation had been read — the awaited US statement sits in this page's don't-know list rather than holding the update. The report sits against President Trump's Monday words to reporters that there had been no fighting for months, and key point 2 has been qualified in place. Video check: no official-channel video of Monday's strike was verified via YouTube's oEmbed endpoint in this run — the footage found was of earlier Qeshm events or from non-official channels — so the story continues without a video. This story carries no French or Arabic full text, so no full-text rebuild arose. The story stays in Checking.
Checking in progress — the Guards claim two US drones downed at Hormuz (queue #1083): the IRGC said on Monday its Aerospace Force brought down two US MQM-170 drones south of Qeshm Island with electronic warfare systems, bringing to four the number of that type it says it has captured (Tasnim via Anadolu, read in full via live-browser recovery; The Insight International, read in full). Added as a Not yet verified claim: it is one side's military claim, no US response to this incident was reported, and the US rejected a similar account last week. Video check: no official-channel video of this claim was verified via YouTube's oEmbed endpoint in this run, so the story still carries none.
Checking in progress — Trump downplays post-midterm strikes (queue #1050): after his Reflecting Pool speech on Monday evening, President Trump was asked by reporters whether he was considering striking Iran after Tuesday's midterm elections and replied 'no'; he said Iran wants a deal and one 'could happen', and told Axios there is 'no rush' to decide on resuming strikes, adding the talks are 'going fine' (Reuters, read in full; Anadolu, read in full — the same 'no' and the same Axios interview). Vice President Vance said there had been 'a number of good conversations with the Iranians'. The claim carrying Trump's latest stated position has been replaced in place: his Sunday wording — that the US could strike after the midterms, and RSBN's 'make a deal or we'll just end it' — is superseded as his stated position and remains recorded in the 19:40 update below. No formal decision has been announced and no US acceptance of Iran's plan is reported. Video check: no White House official-channel video of the reporter exchange was verified via oEmbed in this run, so the story continues without a video.
Checking in progress — the 'accelerated plan' reporting is now on the record (queue #1022): Al Jazeera (staff and AP, read in full) confirms the core of this page — Baghaei's 'condensed and can be implemented within two days', Khamenei's reported grant of powers to speed the talks, Araghchi in Ashgabat saying Hormuz opens if the conditions are accepted — and adds two elements now carried as verified claims: Trump's latest stated position ('going fine'; on RSBN, Tehran will 'make a deal or we'll just end it') and Tehran's full stated conditions (blockade lifted, sanctions repealed, a guarantee against strikes, a complete regional ceasefire especially in Lebanon), with Qatar and Pakistan named as the mediating pair. No US acceptance is reported. Video check in this pass: no official-channel embeddable video of the day's statements was verified via oEmbed, so the story still carries no video.
Checking in progress — oil extended its fall later on Monday (queue #1005/#1007, one move): the Guardian reported Brent crude dropped more than 6.5% to as low as $105.55 a barrel, its lowest since 16 October, and Anadolu reported Brent at $104.43, down nearly 8%, with US crude down 7.3% to $96.50, as the US–Iran diplomacy eased supply fears. These are later intraday snapshots of the same slide carried in this page's oil claim ($106.65 by 13:57 GMT), not a separate move — no new claim card is added, per the replace-don't-stack rule; the settled close is still to come.
Checking in progress — the mediated contacts are "very intensive" and oil drops about 6%: Reuters reported on Monday that Foreign Minister Araghchi, via IRNA, said consultations through mediators are very intensive, Tehran has presented its conditions and everything depends on Washington, after the Doha round ended with no breakthrough; President Pezeshkian said Khamenei had granted the government "certain authorities" for peace talks and Tehran would try dialogue; Brent fell $6.78 (6.0%) to $106.65 and WTI $6.37 (6.1%) to $97.75 by 13:57 GMT. China and Russia both spoke Monday against renewed military action. Iranian sources' belief that a US attack is still more likely than a deal is added as Not yet verified. Four claims added (four Verified as statements, process and market figures; one Not yet verified). This story stays in Checking.
Checking in progress — the Doha track pauses for Tehran's review: Reuters reported on Monday, via an official briefed on the talks, that the Iranian negotiators left Doha on Sunday after three days with Qatari mediators — not because of difficulties — that a draft proposal is being circulated for feedback and that a follow-up meeting is possible; TASS carried the same departure. Foreign Ministry spokesman Baghaei said Monday that messages with the US continue through mediators and that the revised proposal could be implemented within two days if Washington meets Iran's conditions, including ending the naval blockade. Two claims added, both labelled Verified as the talks' process and Iran's stated position; the draft's contents go to the don't-know list, and Washington's answer is still not public. This story stays in Checking.
Checking in progress — Washington's rhetoric hardened on Sunday (queue #845/#847/#849). President Trump told a rally in Dubuque, Iowa that he had held back from finishing with Iran to save lives, adding: 'But at some point we're going to have to give them the hammer'; earlier he told reporters one or two remaining targets, naming Pickaxe Mountain, could be struck within minutes, and he told RSBN: 'Either they'll make a deal, or we'll just end it' (AFP via Arab News; CNBC — both read in full). Axios reported that Netanyahu pressed Trump in their Saturday call to strike immediately after the midterms; Trump confirmed the call ('We had a very good conversation') but not the urging, which is carried as a Not yet verified claim (Jerusalem Post). Rubio's weekend line — Trump wants the war ended 'peacefully and as soon as possible' and has not decided — is folded into the new claim's note rather than stacked over his Saturday statement. This story stays in Checking.
Checking in progress — a further vessel was reported struck in the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday. UKMTO said a merchant vessel's master relayed a Mayday call reporting another vessel hit by an unknown projectile just after 15:00 UTC; the report itself is verified from the agency's wording carried by Reuters, AFP and Anadolu, and is carried here as a claim. The Maritime Executive, citing security consultancy Vanguard Tech, identifies the vessel as the UAE-owned offshore tug Selat Storm, reported partially sinking northwest of the Musandam Peninsula — that identification and the crew position are labelled Not yet verified, and no attacker has been officially identified. Earlier queue items #790/#815 on Sunday Hormuz strikes were held while a separate Sunday incident could not be established; the UKMTO wording and the vessel identification are what changed in this run.
Checking in progress — Iran's warnings sharpened on Sunday evening. Army spokesman Mohammad Akraminia said on Iranian state television that a potential future war could last longer than the previous conflict, and that the American president "would not be in a position to dictate the timing or the conditions of its conclusion" (AFP report, carried by Punch and other outlets). IRGC spokesman Hossein Mohebbi echoed the Supreme Leader's line that in a conflict with America "there are no geographical limitations", and Defence Minister Mehrdad Akhlaghi said any attack would trigger a response whose scale and timing Iran would set itself. These are Iran's stated positions, carried as such — Not yet verified as anything beyond statements made. They answer President Trump's Saturday remarks that the US still has "one or two sites" to "take care of" in Iran. No new US decision on strikes has been announced; Secretary Rubio's position on the page — that no decision has been taken and diplomacy remains open — is unchanged.
Checking in progress — the Doha track moved into a third day on Sunday: Reuters reports Iranian negotiators spent a third consecutive day in Doha in talks with Qatari mediators aimed at a deal to end the war, and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told state media the talks were 'ongoing and progressing', that discussion of the two-day Hormuz proposal was continuing and that no final conclusion had been reached. No agreement has been announced; whether Washington accepts any part of the proposal stays in this page's don't-know list.
Published in Checking state: the leader's order, the Doha talks and the UK designations are each confirmed by the primary statements or by two independent reports, and are labelled accordingly. What would close the check: a US decision on strikes, any agreed Hormuz terms, and a UK response to the designations.