Markets · delayed Markets · delayed · loading…
← Back to all news
World Middle EastConflictsDiplomacy Checking in progress Published 14 November 2026 · Updated 14 Nov, 13:38 UTC

Trump has told advisers he may hold off on attacking Iran if there are no new provocations, sources say

President Donald Trump has told senior advisers in recent days that he may hold off on attacking Iran if the US faces no new provocations from Tehran or the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, according to three people familiar with the matter who spoke to Reuters. Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Türkiye's President Erdoğan have both urged him not to resume attacks, the sources say. The White House says only Trump knows what he will do. The account rests on anonymous sourcing and has not been confirmed by any official announcement.

President Donald Trump delivering remarks at the UN General Assembly in New York (file photo)
Photo: Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok via Wikimedia Commons (public domain) · (File photo — not from this event)

Checking in progress

This story is still being checked. Claims below are published as claims — never dressed as facts — and each one moves only when the evidence earns it.

  1. Collecting reportsDone
  2. Grouping the versionsDone
  3. 3Checking claims3 of 6 claims checked
  4. 4Human gateStill to come

3 of 6 claims checked so far · step 3 of 4: Checking claims

Key points

  • Trump may hold off on new Iran strikes if there are no new provocations, three people familiar with the matter tell Reuters — an anonymous-source account, not an announced decision.
  • Saudi Arabia's crown prince and Türkiye's president have both urged him not to resume attacks, the sources say.
  • The White House says only Trump knows what he will do, and the US military is reported ready to escalate if needed.
Show more (1)
  • A Reuters/Ipsos poll before the midterms put 55 percent of Americans against the war's cost.
Your take
Sign in to record your take — it’s free, so one person counts once
Takes sit on a free account, so one person counts once.

What happened

The war Trump launched with Israel in February has pushed up global fuel prices and turned unpopular at home: the Republicans lost control of Congress in the 3 November midterms, and the president has alternated in public between threatening escalation and winding down hostilities.

This week he signalled both directions at once — telling an interviewer he was taking a longer, 'more civil' route at the request of the nations the US is protecting, while posting that the US does not need a deal with Iran.

What we know / what we don't know yet

What we know

  • Trump's public remarks this week, and the White House's on-record statement that only he knows what he will do.
  • Türkiye's presidency confirms three Trump–Erdoğan calls since 28 October and a 7 November readout stressing that tensions need to end.

What we don't know yet

  • Whether Trump will in fact hold off — the private remarks are reported by anonymous sources, and he has made no commitment, the sources say.
  • Iran's response to the reported position — none was in the reporting read.
  • What would count as a new provocation — no definition was reported.
§

Claim by claim

3 verified· 0 disputed· 3 not yet verified· 0 corrected
Show all claims (6)
Not yet verified
President Trump has told senior advisers in recent days that he may hold off on attacking Iran if the US faces no new provocations from Tehran or the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, according to three people familiar with the matter; in meetings with his national security advisers and after intelligence briefings, he said he was considering holding off on strikes.

Why this label: The account of private remarks rests on anonymous sources speaking to Reuters; no official has announced a decision, and Trump has made no commitment either way, the sources say.

On the ladder: the evidence so far sits low — early, single or social sources. We publish the claim as a claim, never as fact.

Verified
Trump's public remarks this week played down a return to major warfare: he told broadcaster Stephen A. Smith on Thursday, 'I could end it immediately, but at the request of the nations that I am looking to protect, we are doing it a little bit longer way, a bit more civilly,' and in a social media post on Thursday he said, 'We don't need a deal with Iran.'

Why this label: Both are the president's own public words, reported by Reuters; what he will actually do is a separate question, carried in the don't-know list.

On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.

Verified
A White House official said in a statement: 'As Commander-in-Chief, President Trump is the architect and sole decision-maker who holds all the cards... The United States is in a very strong position with control of the Strait of Hormuz and the Iranian economy collapsing. Only President Trump knows what he will do, and when.' The official also said the US military has enough munitions for all of the president's strategic goals.

Why this label: The White House's on-record response to Reuters; it neither confirms nor denies the reported private remarks.

On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.

Not yet verified
In phone calls over the past two weeks, Trump asked for the opinions of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Turkish President Tayyip Erdoğan, who both urged him not to resume attacks on Iran, according to a senior US official and another person familiar with the matter; on 31 October Trump told bin Salman he was planning to attack after the elections, and the crown prince pleaded for him to hold off, arguing sanctions were working, two more people said.

Why this label: The leaders' advice rests on anonymous sourcing. On the record: Türkiye's presidency says Trump and Erdoğan have spoken three times since 28 October, and its readout of the 7 November call stressed that US–Iran tensions need to end; Saudi Arabia's Foreign Ministry did not respond to Reuters.

On the ladder: the evidence so far sits low — early, single or social sources. We publish the claim as a claim, never as fact.

Not yet verified
US intelligence agencies have assessed that the naval blockade and economic sanctions are hurting Iran's economy and would keep pressuring Tehran, and that renewed strikes would not significantly shift Iran's demands in negotiations, two US officials briefed on the intelligence said; the US military is ready to escalate if needed, and a third aircraft carrier is moving into the Middle East in the coming days, three more people familiar with US planning said.

Why this label: Assessments and planning details from anonymous officials reported by Reuters; Israeli officials have continued to lobby the administration for another military campaign, according to a US official in the same report.

On the ladder: the evidence so far sits low — early, single or social sources. We publish the claim as a claim, never as fact.

Verified
In a Reuters/Ipsos poll taken shortly before the 3 November elections, 55 percent of Americans said the war was not worth the cost, and Vice President JD Vance has cited the war as the reason Trump's Republicans lost control of Congress in last week's midterms.

Why this label: The poll is Reuters/Ipsos's own, reported by Reuters; Vance's attribution is his stated position.

On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.

Why it matters

Whether the United States resumes striking Iran decides fuel prices, shipping through Hormuz and the risk of a wider war. The reporting suggests the decision is genuinely open — and that Gulf and Turkish leaders are pressing for restraint while Israeli officials press the other way.

Background

  • The US and Israel launch the war on Iran.

  • US midterm elections: Republicans lose control of Congress; a pre-election Reuters/Ipsos poll put 55 percent of Americans against the war's cost.

  • Trump posts that the US does not 'need a deal with Iran.'

Update history

No silent edits. Every change is written here, with its time.

  • Latest

    Published in Checking state — the reported private remarks rest on anonymous sources and no decision has been announced, so they are labelled as reported while checking continues.

← Back to all news