Ghana's Parliament finds no evidence MPs received alleged $46,000 AKSA payments, and sends its review to the Special Prosecutor
Ghana's Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, told the House on Wednesday that an internal administrative review of the approval of the 2015 AKSA emergency power agreement found no evidence that any MP or Parliamentary Service officer received the alleged payments of about $46,000, said to have been paid to influence the approval. Mr Bagbin stressed that the review was administrative, not a criminal investigation — it could not compel witnesses, take evidence under oath or see bank records — so it neither establishes whether payments were made nor absolves anyone. He directed that the report and its documents go to the Office of the Special Prosecutor and other investigative bodies.

Checking in progress
This story is still being checked. Claims below are published as claims — never dressed as facts — and each one moves only when the evidence earns it.
- Collecting reportsDone
- Grouping the versionsDone
- Checking claims5 of 5 claims checked
- 4Human gateWe are here
5 of 5 claims checked so far · step 4 of 4: Human gate
Key points
- Parliament's review found no evidence any MP or Parliamentary Service officer received the alleged $46,000 AKSA payments, Speaker Bagbin told the House.
- The review was administrative only — no power to compel witnesses or see bank records — and the Speaker said it neither proves no payments were made nor absolves anyone.
- The report and its documents go to the Office of the Special Prosecutor and other investigative bodies, with Parliament's records preserved.
Show more (1)
- The allegations arose from US proceedings involving former Goldman Sachs banker Asante Kwaku Berko and surfaced in August 2026.
What happened
The AKSA emergency power agreement was approved in July 2015, during Ghana's power crisis, when emergency generation deals were signed at speed. The allegation now before investigators — that about $46,000 was paid to persons associated with the legislature to facilitate that approval — comes not from a Ghanaian inquiry but from proceedings in the United States involving the banker who worked on the project's financing.
Parliament's own review could only look inside Parliament: its records, its correspondence and voluntary interviews. Everything outside that room — bank transfers, private communications, the money itself — sits with the criminal investigators the Speaker has now handed the file to.
What we know / what we don't know yet
What we know
- That Parliament's administrative review found no evidence in its records or interviews that any MP or officer received the alleged payments.
- That the Speaker has sent the report and documents to the Office of the Special Prosecutor and other investigative bodies.
- That the review could not compel witnesses or examine bank records — its limits are stated by the Speaker himself.
What we don't know yet
- Whether the alleged payments were in fact made — the review could not establish that either way, and the OSP's investigation has not reported.
- The Special Prosecutor's response — no statement from the OSP was in the reporting read.
- The full text of the review report — the Speaker announced its findings; the report itself has not been published in the reporting read.
Claim by claim
Show all claims (5)
Why this label: The finding is the Speaker's own announcement to the House, reported in agreement by Joy Online, Channel One News and The Vaultz News, each read in full. It is a finding of no evidence in Parliament's records and interviews — the Speaker said so himself — not a finding that no payment was made.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: The origin of the allegations in the US proceedings is reported in the same terms by Joy Online and Channel One News; the conviction and awaiting-sentencing detail is Joy Online's reporting. The $46,000 payment itself remains an allegation from those proceedings, not a finding of any court reported here.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: The records examined, the interviews and the 2015 dates are stated by the Speaker and reported in agreement by Channel One News and The Vaultz News.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: The limits and the quoted line are the Speaker's own words, reported by Joy Online, Channel One News and The Vaultz News in agreement.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why this label: The referral and the preservation direction are the Speaker's directives, reported by Joy Online, Channel One News and The Vaultz News in agreement.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why it matters
A legislature reviewing itself can only clear its own shelves. The value of Wednesday's announcement is its honesty about that limit: the 'no evidence' finding covers Parliament's records, and the question of whether money moved now passes to the Special Prosecutor, who can follow it. How the OSP handles a file handed over this publicly will be its own test.
Background
The AKSA emergency power agreement is laid before Parliament, reported on by the Committee on Mines and Energy on 16 July and approved on 17 July 2015.
Allegations surface from US proceedings involving former Goldman Sachs banker Asante Kwaku Berko that about $46,000 was paid to persons associated with the legislature over the agreement's approval.
Speaker Bagbin announces the administrative review found no evidence any MP or officer received the payments, and refers the report to the Special Prosecutor.
Update history
No silent edits. Every change is written here, with its time.
- Latest
Published in Checking state — Parliament's finding and the referral are on the record, and the Special Prosecutor's investigation is still to come.