Markets · delayed Markets · delayed · loading…
← Back to all news
World GazaConflictsHealth Checking in progress Published 11 November 2026 · Updated 11 Nov, 15:55 UTC

Israeli courts deny the release of 14 Gaza doctors and deny an independent medical exam for Dr Abu Safiya

Two Israeli courts have denied petitions by Physicians for Human Rights Israel: the Supreme Court dismissed a request to release 14 Palestinian doctors held without charge or trial, and the Lod District Court denied a request for an independent medical examination of Dr Hussam Abu Safiya, the Kamal Adwan Hospital director detained since December 2024. A specialist who reviewed Abu Safiya's prison medical records says his weight fell by 14 kilograms in four months and that documented injuries and a fall in haemoglobin were not properly investigated. The state told the court Abu Safiya is receiving regular care and his health is not at risk.

The Supreme Court of Israel building in Jerusalem (file photo)
Photo: Triggerhippie4 via Wikimedia Commons · (File photo — not from this event)

Checking in progress

This story is still being checked. Claims below are published as claims — never dressed as facts — and each one moves only when the evidence earns it.

  1. Collecting reportsDone
  2. Grouping the versionsDone
  3. 3Checking claims5 of 6 claims checked
  4. 4Human gateStill to come

5 of 6 claims checked so far · step 3 of 4: Checking claims

Key points

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the petition to release 14 Gaza doctors held without charge or trial, finding no grounds to intervene in the chief of staff's detention decision.
  • The Lod District Court denied an independent medical examination for Kamal Adwan director Dr Hussam Abu Safiya, detained since 27 December 2024.
  • A specialist's review of his prison medical records found a 14-kilogram weight loss in four months, a fall in haemoglobin, and documented injuries the records do not explain.
Show more (1)
  • The state says Abu Safiya receives regular care and his health is not at risk; the prison service calls the allegations a campaign to discredit Israel.
Your take
Sign in to record your take — it’s free, so one person counts once
Takes sit on a free account, so one person counts once.

What happened

Abu Safiya stayed at Kamal Adwan Hospital through months of siege before Israeli forces raided it on 27 December 2024 and detained him. He has been held under the Unlawful Combatants Law, which allows detention without trial, and in June 2026 the Supreme Court upheld his detention; he was transferred the same month to Rakefet, where PHRI says he has been held in isolation.

PHRI brought both petitions as Gaza's hospitals work with a severe shortage of senior doctors. The group says 14 Palestinian doctors, including hospital directors and specialists, remain in Israeli prisons without charge or trial; the UN Human Rights Office in July called for Abu Safiya to be released or charged and given a fair trial.

What we know / what we don't know yet

What we know

  • That both petitions were denied, on PHRI's account of the rulings, reported in the same terms by Al Jazeera, Arab News and the Guardian's reporting.
  • That Abu Safiya has been held without charge since 27 December 2024, and what his prison medical records show, on the specialist review PHRI obtained.
  • That the state assured the court he receives regular care, and the prison service rejects the allegations.

What we don't know yet

  • Abu Safiya's current health — PHRI says the prison service has refused to release his updated medical file, and no independent doctor has examined him.
  • How the injuries recorded on 5 July 2026 happened — the records do not say, and his beating allegation has not been independently tested.
  • Whether any further appeal will be brought, and when the detention orders next come up for review.
§

Claim by claim

5 verified· 0 disputed· 1 not yet verified· 0 corrected
Show all claims (6)
Verified
Physicians for Human Rights Israel (PHRI) said on Wednesday that the Supreme Court had dismissed its petition to release 14 Palestinian doctors — including hospital directors and specialists — who are held in Israeli prisons without charge or trial, in some cases for more than two years. The court found no grounds to intervene in the military chief of staff's decision to keep them in detention. PHRI argued the detentions violate the doctors' rights and deepen Gaza's severe shortage of medical professionals, and urged the chief of staff to revoke the detention orders, which are made under Israel's Unlawful Combatants Law.

Why this label: The dismissal and the court's reason are PHRI's account of the ruling it petitioned for, reported in the same terms by Al Jazeera and Arab News; the state told the court the cases had been reviewed and no exceptional grounds justified release.

On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.

Verified
The Lod District Court denied PHRI's request for Dr Hussam Abu Safiya, the director of Kamal Adwan Hospital in northern Gaza, to undergo an independent medical examination and obtain a second opinion. PHRI said an independent examination is a right protected by Israel's Patients' Rights Law and prison service regulations, and does not depend on proving a life-threatening condition.

Why this label: The denial is reported by Arab News, read in full, and by the Guardian's reporting of the same ruling; PHRI's legal argument is its own position as petitioner.

On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.

Verified
Abu Safiya, a paediatrician, was detained by Israeli forces on 27 December 2024 during the raid that closed Kamal Adwan Hospital, and has been held since as an "unlawful combatant" without charge or trial. He was transferred to the Rakefet detention facility in June 2026, has been held in isolation since then, and is now detained with only one other prisoner, PHRI says.

Why this label: The detention date, place and legal designation are reported consistently by Al Jazeera, the Guardian's reporting and CIVICUS/PHRI's campaign statement; the isolation detail is PHRI's, from its lawyer's visits.

On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.

Verified
Professor Amit Tirosh, an independent Israeli specialist in internal medicine and endocrinology, reviewed Abu Safiya's Israel Prison Service medical records, obtained by PHRI, and found his weight fell from 90 kilograms in January 2025 to 76 kilograms four months later; his haemoglobin fell between February and July 2026; chest pain was not properly investigated; a scabies diagnosis was delayed by about a month; and an examination on 5 July 2026 recorded bruising around his left eye, dizziness and rib pain. Tirosh, who was not permitted to examine Abu Safiya in person, said the findings warranted further investigation and that the court's account was "inconsistent with the data".

Why this label: These are Tirosh's findings from the prison service's own records, reported in agreement by the Guardian, Al Jazeera and Arab News. They verify what the records and his review show; they do not by themselves establish how the injuries happened.

On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.

Not yet verified
Abu Safiya told his lawyer that prison guards punched, kicked and beat him with batons after his transfer to Rakefet, and that he had breathing difficulties and vision problems; his lawyer set the account out in a sworn affidavit. The medical records do not explain how the documented injuries occurred.

Why this label: This is Abu Safiya's allegation, through his lawyer. No independent examination has been allowed, and the prison service disputes the wider allegations (see its response below), so the beating account itself is not verified.

On the ladder: the evidence so far sits low — early, single or social sources. We publish the claim as a claim, never as fact.

Verified
The state told the Supreme Court that Abu Safiya was receiving regular medical care and that his health was not at risk. A spokesperson for the Israel Prison Service told the Guardian that the allegations were part of a broader campaign aimed at discrediting the state of Israel, and that the service operates in accordance with the law and under constant judicial oversight. In the examination case, authorities relied in part on closed proceedings alleging Abu Safiya had manipulated his condition and influenced other prisoners — allegations PHRI says the records do not support and which were not tested with Abu Safiya or his lawyers present.

Why this label: Each element is the state's or the prison service's own stated position, carried as their positions: the assurances are reported by Arab News, the prison service's words by the Guardian, and the closed-proceedings allegations are PHRI's account of the ruling, reported by Arab News and MENAFN.

On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.

Why it matters

The rulings keep 14 of Gaza's most senior doctors in detention without trial while its health system is short of exactly those specialists — and they leave the only medical account of the best-known detainee resting on prison records no independent doctor has been allowed to test in person.

Background

Show the background timeline (5)
  • Israeli forces raid Kamal Adwan Hospital in northern Gaza and detain its director, Dr Hussam Abu Safiya; the hospital is put out of service.

  • The Supreme Court upholds Abu Safiya's detention; he is transferred to the Rakefet detention facility and held in isolation.

  • The UN Human Rights Office calls for his immediate release or, failing that, charges, a fair trial and transfer to a civilian hospital.

  • CIVICUS and PHRI add Abu Safiya to the Stand As My Witness campaign, calling for the release of all 14 detained Gaza doctors.

  • PHRI announces the two court denials: no release for the 14 doctors, and no independent medical examination for Abu Safiya.

Update history

No silent edits. Every change is written here, with its time.

  • Latest

    Published in Checking state — the two court denials are confirmed by the petitioning rights group's account across several reports, and Abu Safiya's current health and the cause of his recorded injuries remain unestablished.

← Back to all news