Weil, Gotshal & Manges partners vote to dissolve the 95-year-old law firm
Partners at Weil, Gotshal & Manges voted on Tuesday to wind down the 95-year-old US law firm, according to reports by Reuters and Bloomberg Law, formalising a collapse that followed months of partner departures and failed merger talks. A three-person committee will oversee the dissolution, Bloomberg Law reported, with support from 97% of partners. Both reports attribute the vote to people familiar with the matter, and neither carried a statement from the firm confirming it.
Checking in progress
This story is still being checked. Claims below are published as claims — never dressed as facts — and each one moves only when the evidence earns it.
- Collecting reportsDone
- Grouping the versionsDone
- 3Checking claims1 of 3 claims checked
- 4Human gateStill to come
1 of 3 claims checked so far · step 3 of 4: Checking claims
Key points
- Partners voted on Tuesday to wind down Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Reuters and Bloomberg Law report — the end of a 95-year-old firm.
- A three-person committee (Carangelo, Wessel, Ferrari) will oversee the dissolution; Barry Wolf stays on as a consultant, the reports say.
- Bloomberg Law and Law.com put the vote at 97% of partners.
Show more (1)
- The firm itself has not yet published a statement confirming the vote in the reporting read.
What happened
Weil was a Wall Street institution of about 1,200 lawyers, known for building a leading bankruptcy practice inside a large firm. Its leadership recommended dissolution on 28 October after months of partner departures to rival firms and the collapse of merger discussions — Tuesday's vote puts that recommendation into effect, on the reports' account.
What we know / what we don't know yet
What we know
- That the firm's leadership recommended an orderly wind-down on 28 October, in the firm's own statement.
- That Reuters, Bloomberg Law and Law.com all report a partners' vote on Tuesday to dissolve, with the same committee named.
What we don't know yet
- The firm's own confirmation of the vote and its result — no statement from Weil appears in the reporting read.
- When the firm will cease operations, and the arrangements for clients, junior lawyers and staff beyond the October statement.
Claim by claim
Show all claims (3)
Why this label: Reuters reports the vote on the word of two people familiar with the matter, and Bloomberg Law, which reported it first, likewise cites a person familiar. Law.com reports the same vote. No statement from the firm confirming the vote appears in the reporting read, so the vote is carried on that sourcing, not as the firm's own announcement.
On the ladder: the evidence so far sits low — early, single or social sources. We publish the claim as a claim, never as fact.
Why this label: The committee membership is reported by both Reuters and Bloomberg Law on anonymous sourcing; the 97% figure is Bloomberg Law's and Law.com's, each citing a person familiar with the results. The firm has not published the results in the reporting read.
On the ladder: the evidence so far sits low — early, single or social sources. We publish the claim as a claim, never as fact.
Why this label: The October recommendation and the firm's statement are the firm's own words, reported at the time. The departures and failed talks are the context given in that reporting and in Tuesday's reports.
On the ladder: a claim earns Verified from primary evidence, or from two independent sources that do not copy each other.
Why it matters
A solvent wind-down of a firm this size is rare: hundreds of lawyers, clients and cases must move in an orderly way, and the vote sets the timetable. The reports agree on the outcome and the committee, but the firm's own confirmation will settle the terms its people and clients are working to.
Background
Weil's management committee recommends an orderly wind-down to the partnership after partner departures and failed merger talks.
Partners vote to dissolve, according to Reuters, Bloomberg Law and Law.com; a three-person committee is to oversee it.
Update history
No silent edits. Every change is written here, with its time.
- Latest
Published in Checking state — the vote is reported consistently by three outlets on anonymous sourcing, and the firm's own confirmation is still awaited.